World Population PyramidsPopulation pyramids and indicators by country and year日本語

Prefectures by share aged 65+ (2040)

Kagoshima 38.8%Oita 38.4%Fukuoka 32.7%Saga 36.7%Nagasaki 40.9%Kumamoto 36.7%Miyazaki 38.5%Tokushima 41.7%Kagawa 37.3%Ehime 40.2%Kochi 42.5%Shimane 37.8%Yamaguchi 40.0%Tottori 38.2%Hyogo 37.0%Kyoto 35.9%Fukui 37.6%Ishikawa 36.4%Toyama 39.1%Niigata 39.9%Yamagata 40.9%Akita 45.9%Aomori 43.9%Iwate 41.8%Miyagi 35.4%Fukushima 40.3%Ibaraki 37.2%Chiba 33.5%Tokyo 27.3%Kanagawa 32.9%Shizuoka 37.2%Aichi 31.9%Mie 37.2%Wakayama 41.2%Osaka 34.2%Okayama 35.5%Hiroshima 35.3%Hokkaido 39.7%Gunma 37.5%Nagano 39.2%Tochigi 36.9%Gifu 37.9%Shiga 33.7%Saitama 33.3%Yamanashi 39.6%Nara 40.6%Okinawa 30.8%
40.3%〜45.9%38.5%〜40.2%37.2%〜38.4%35.3%〜37.0%27.3%〜34.2%

Select a prefecture on the map to open its population pyramid.

#PrefectureAged 65+2020
1Akita45.9%37.5%
2Aomori43.9%33.7%
3Kochi42.5%35.5%
4Iwate41.8%33.6%
5Tokushima41.7%34.2%
6Wakayama41.2%33.4%
7Yamagata40.9%33.8%
8Nagasaki40.9%33.0%
9Nara40.6%31.7%
10Fukushima40.3%31.7%
11Ehime40.2%33.2%
12Yamaguchi40.0%34.6%
13Niigata39.9%32.8%
14Hokkaido39.7%32.1%
15Yamanashi39.6%30.8%
16Nagano39.2%32.0%
17Toyama39.1%32.6%
18Kagoshima38.8%32.5%
19Miyazaki38.5%32.6%
20Oita38.4%33.3%
21Tottori38.2%32.3%
22Gifu37.9%30.4%
23Shimane37.8%34.2%
24Fukui37.6%30.6%
25Gunma37.5%30.2%
26Kagawa37.3%31.8%
27Ibaraki37.2%29.7%
28Shizuoka37.2%30.1%
29Mie37.2%29.9%
30Hyogo37.0%29.3%
31Tochigi36.9%29.1%
32Saga36.7%30.6%
33Kumamoto36.7%31.4%
34Ishikawa36.4%29.8%
35Kyoto35.9%29.3%
36Okayama35.5%30.3%
37Miyagi35.4%28.1%
38Hiroshima35.3%29.4%
39Osaka34.2%27.6%
40Shiga33.7%26.3%
41Chiba33.5%27.6%
42Saitama33.3%27.0%
43Kanagawa32.9%25.6%
44Fukuoka32.7%27.9%
45Aichi31.9%25.3%
46Okinawa30.8%22.6%
47Tokyo27.3%22.7%

Source: processed from the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Regional Population Projections for Japan (2023) (https://www.ipss.go.jp/pp-shicyoson/j/shicyoson23/t-page.asp). 2020 is the census; 2025 onwards are projections.