World Population PyramidsPopulation pyramids and indicators by country and year日本語

Prefectures by share aged 65+ (2045)

Kagoshima 40.2%Oita 39.8%Fukuoka 34.1%Saga 38.2%Nagasaki 42.3%Kumamoto 37.9%Miyazaki 39.9%Tokushima 43.5%Kagawa 38.8%Ehime 41.9%Kochi 44.4%Shimane 39.0%Yamaguchi 41.5%Tottori 39.7%Hyogo 38.6%Kyoto 37.6%Fukui 39.3%Ishikawa 37.8%Toyama 40.7%Niigata 41.9%Yamagata 42.9%Akita 48.3%Aomori 46.4%Iwate 44.1%Miyagi 37.7%Fukushima 42.5%Ibaraki 38.9%Chiba 34.8%Tokyo 28.6%Kanagawa 34.3%Shizuoka 38.7%Aichi 33.5%Mie 38.7%Wakayama 42.7%Osaka 35.7%Okayama 36.9%Hiroshima 36.7%Hokkaido 41.5%Gunma 39.1%Nagano 40.9%Tochigi 38.6%Gifu 39.6%Shiga 35.5%Saitama 34.7%Yamanashi 41.0%Nara 42.3%Okinawa 32.5%
42.3%〜48.3%39.9%〜41.9%38.7%〜39.8%36.7%〜38.6%28.6%〜35.7%

Select a prefecture on the map to open its population pyramid.

#PrefectureAged 65+2020
1Akita48.3%37.5%
2Aomori46.4%33.7%
3Kochi44.4%35.5%
4Iwate44.1%33.6%
5Tokushima43.5%34.2%
6Yamagata42.9%33.8%
7Wakayama42.7%33.4%
8Fukushima42.5%31.7%
9Nara42.3%31.7%
10Nagasaki42.3%33.0%
11Niigata41.9%32.8%
12Ehime41.9%33.2%
13Hokkaido41.5%32.1%
14Yamaguchi41.5%34.6%
15Yamanashi41.0%30.8%
16Nagano40.9%32.0%
17Toyama40.7%32.6%
18Kagoshima40.2%32.5%
19Miyazaki39.9%32.6%
20Oita39.8%33.3%
21Tottori39.7%32.3%
22Gifu39.6%30.4%
23Fukui39.3%30.6%
24Gunma39.1%30.2%
25Shimane39.0%34.2%
26Ibaraki38.9%29.7%
27Kagawa38.8%31.8%
28Shizuoka38.7%30.1%
29Mie38.7%29.9%
30Tochigi38.6%29.1%
31Hyogo38.6%29.3%
32Saga38.2%30.6%
33Kumamoto37.9%31.4%
34Ishikawa37.8%29.8%
35Miyagi37.7%28.1%
36Kyoto37.6%29.3%
37Okayama36.9%30.3%
38Hiroshima36.7%29.4%
39Osaka35.7%27.6%
40Shiga35.5%26.3%
41Chiba34.8%27.6%
42Saitama34.7%27.0%
43Kanagawa34.3%25.6%
44Fukuoka34.1%27.9%
45Aichi33.5%25.3%
46Okinawa32.5%22.6%
47Tokyo28.6%22.7%

Source: processed from the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Regional Population Projections for Japan (2023) (https://www.ipss.go.jp/pp-shicyoson/j/shicyoson23/t-page.asp). 2020 is the census; 2025 onwards are projections.